Refer to the exhibit. An engineer is trying to block the route to 192.168.2.2 from the routing table by using the configuration that is shown. The route is still present in the routing table as an OSPF route. Which action blocks the route? 006.png
Show Answer & Explanation
Correct Answer: B. Change sequence 10 in the route-map command from permit to deny.
The current route-map RM-OSPF-DL has permit at sequence 10, which matches 192.168.2.2 and permits it into the routing table — the opposite of what is needed. To block the route, sequence 10 must be changed to deny so that matched routes are filtered out. A distribute-list with a route-map using deny will prevent the matched prefix from being installed. Option A is wrong because standard access lists match host addresses, and this ACL already correctly matches 192.168.2.2; an extended ACL is not needed here. Option C is wrong because a prefix-list could also work, but the issue is the permit action, not the match method. Option D is wrong because adding a deny 20 without fixing the permit 10 still allows the route through at sequence 10 first.